|
|
|
This article or section is in need of attention from an expert on the subject. Please help recruit one or improve this article yourself. See the talk page for details. Please consider using {{Expert-subject}} to associate this request with a WikiProject |
| This article needs additional citations for verification. Please help improve this article by adding reliable references. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed. (January 2008) |
Gabriel Honoré Marcel (7 December 1889 Paris – 8 October 1973http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/marcel/ Paris) was a French philosopher, a leading Christian existentialist, and the author of about 30 plays.
Contents |
Marcel obtained the agregation in philosophy in 1910, at the unusually early age of 21. He taught in secondary schools, was a drama critic for various literary journals, and worked as an editor for Plon, the major French Catholic publisher.
Marcel was the son of an atheist, and was himself an atheist until his conversion to Catholicism in 1929. Marcel was opposed to anti-Semitism and supported reaching out to non-Catholics.
He is often classified as one of the earliest existentialists, although he dreaded being put in the same category as Jean-Paul Sartre; Marcel came to prefer the label "neo-Socratic" (possibly because of Søren Kierkegaard, the father of Christian existentialism, who was a neo-Socratic thinker himself). While Marcel recognized that human interaction often involved objective characterisation of "the other", he still asserted the possibility of "communion" - a state where both individuals can perceive each other\'s subjectivity.
In The Existential Background of Human Dignity, Marcel refers to a play he had written in 1913 entitled Le Palais de Sable, in order to provide an example of a person who was unable to treat others as subjects.
In this case, Moirans is unable to treat either daughter as a subject, instead rejecting both because each does not conform to her objectified image in his mind. Marcel notes that such objectification "does no less than denude its object of the one thing which he has which is of value, and so it degrades him effectively."Homo Viator, p. 23.
Another related major thread in Marcel was the struggle to protect one\'s subjectivity from annihilation by modern materialism and a technologically driven society. Marcel argued that scientific egoism replaces the "mystery" of being with a false scenario of human life composed of technical "problems" and "solutions." The human subject cannot exist in the technological world, instead being replaced by a human object. As he points out in Man Against Mass Society and other works, technology has a privileged authority with which it persuades the subject to accept his place as "he" in the internal dialogue of science; and as a result, man is convinced by science to rejoice in his own annihilation.Ballard, Edward G. (1967), "Gabriel Marcel: The Mystery of Being", in Schrader, George Alfred, Jr., Existential Philosophers: Kierkegaard to Merleau-Ponty, Toronto: McGraw-Hill, pp. 227
For many years, Marcel hosted a weekly philosophy discussion group through which he met and influenced important younger French philosophers like Jean Wahl, Paul Ricoeur, Emmanuel Levinas, and Jean-Paul Sartre. Marcel was puzzled and disappointed that his reputation was almost entirely based on his philosophical treatises and not on his plays, which he wrote in the hope of appealing to a wider lay audience. Albert Camus and Sartre were far more successful in translating their philosophical concerns into appealing literature.
His major books are Mystery of Being (1951), the Gifford Lectures for 1949-50, and Man Against Mass Society (1955). He gave the William James Lectures at Harvard in 1961-62, published as The Existential Background of Human Dignity.
This article is licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License. It uses material from Wikipedia